Client-centredness and values as a basis of development
| Structure Type: | Course |
|---|
| Code: | KG30KAKE02 |
|---|
| Type: | Compulsory |
|---|
| Level: | Master |
|---|
| Credits: | 3.0 points |
|---|
| Responsible Teacher: | Kyrönlahti, Eija |
|---|
| Language of Instruction: | Finnish |
|---|
Course Implementations, Planned Year of Study and Semester
| Curriculum | Semester | Credits | Start of Semester | End of Semester |
| KEJO-2013 |
1 spring |
2.0 |
2014-01-02 |
2014-07-31 |
| KEJO-2013 |
2 autumn |
1.0 |
2014-09-01 |
2014-12-31 |
| KEJO-2015 |
1 spring |
2.0 |
2016-01-01 |
2016-07-31 |
| KEJO-2015 |
2 autumn |
1.0 |
2016-08-01 |
2016-12-31 |
| KEJO-2016 |
1 spring |
2.0 |
2017-01-01 |
2017-07-31 |
| KEJO-2016 |
2 autumn |
1.0 |
2017-08-01 |
2017-12-31 |
Learning Outcomes
Students know how to analyze and evaluate value principles and client/user-centredness in development work.
Student's Workload
78 hours (24 classroom, 54 independently)
Prerequisites / Recommended Optional Courses
No previous studies are required.
Contents
Ethical aspects and dialogue in development work
Ethical dialogue
Client and user-centredness
Recommended or Required Reading
Juujärvi, S., Myyry, L. & Pesso, K. 2007. Eettinen herkkyys ammatillisessa toiminnassa. Helsinki: Tammi.
Kuula, A. 2006 or later. Tutkimusetiikka. Aineistojen hankinta, käyttö ja säilytys. Tampere: Vastapaino.
Mönkkönen, K. 2007. Vuorovaikutus. Dialoginen asiakastyö. Helsinki: Edita.
Launis, V. 2007. Tutkimuksen eettinen ennakkoarviointi – mitä se on? Tieteessä tapahtuu 1/ 2007
Leino-Kilpi, H. & Välimäki, M. 2003 or later. Etiikka hoitotyössä. Helsinki: WSOY.
Seppälä, M., Kröger, T. & Karisto, A. 2007. Vanhuus ja sosiaalityö: sosiaalityö avuttomuuden ja toimijuuden välissä. Jyväskylä: PS-kustannus.
Simmons, R. 2009. Understanding the differentiated consumer in public services. In R. Simmons, M. Powell & I. Greener (eds.). The consumer in public services. Choice, values and difference. Policy Press, 235-254.
Teeri, S. 2007. Ethical problems in long-term institutional care of older patients in the field of integrity. Turun yliopisto.
Mode of Delivery / Planned Learning Activities and Teaching Methods
Lectures, independent study
Assessment Criteria
Satisfactory (1-2)
Students know how to describe ethical principles and value foundations and their association with development work. Students are able to describe principles of client and user-centred activity.
Good (3-4)
Students know how to compare ethical principles and value foundations and their association with development work. Students are able to compare principles of client and user-centred activity.
Excellent (5)
Students know how to analyze and evaluate ethical principles and value foundations and their association with development work. Students are able to analyze and evaluate principles of client and user-centred activity.
Assessment Methods
based on individual assignments
Back