New technologies in visual production

Structure Type:	Course
Code:	KTST4V02
Level:	Bachelor
Credits:	7.0 points
Responsible Teacher:	Leikkari, Esa
Teacher Team:	Haarala, Juhani ; Savola, Esa
Language of Instruction:	Finnish

Course Implementations, Planned Year of Study and Semester

Curriculum	Semester	Credits	Start of Semester	End of Semester
KUMU-2016	4 autumn	7.0	2019-08-01	2019-12-31

Learning Outcomes

Student can
- find, evaluate and make use of new technologies in visual production (need, product or technology based)
- apply new tehnology to gain surplus value
- evaluate cost effectiveness of particular new techology
- evaluate from user centered orientation the need for new technology

Student's Workload

Scheduled studies: 150 h
Autonomous studies: 240 h

Prerequisites / Recommended Optional Courses

No prerequisites

The project of the visual planning is carried out utilising new technologies.

Mode of Delivery / Planned Learning Activities and Teaching Methods

Project based learning with coordinated exercises and project related studies

Assessment Criteria

0 FAILED

1 SATISFACTORY (POOR)
Production process develops poorly with different stages unclearly defined, personal achievements and counselling in unbalance, specification(s), goal(s) and criteria for intended production and product(s) not clearly organized and analyzed, background work for production commission minimal, quantity and quality of design work (iteratively poor, routine like, mechanical) barely acceptable compared to time used, presentation(s) (customer meeting(s), portfolio, interim deliverables, assessment discussions, final deliverable, complementary deliverables etc.) only moderately (overall comprehensiveness, visual and verbal quality) and mechanically developed by student.

2 SATISFACTORY (FAIR)
Production process develops satisfactorily with different stages at least partially defined, personal achievements and counselling still in some respect unbalanced, specification(s), goal(s) and criteria for intended production and product(s) satisfactorily organized and analyzed, background work for production commission in most respect satisfactory but with little source criticism, quantity and quality of design work (iteratively modest, routine like but with some personal traits) satisfactory compared to time used, presentation(s) (customer meeting(s), portfolio, interim deliverables, assessment discussions, final deliverable, complementary deliverables etc.) satisfactorily (overall comprehensiveness, visual and verbal quality) and with some personal traits developed by student.

3 GOOD
Production process develops fairly good with different stages clearly defined, personal achievements and counselling are in most respect balanced, specification(s), goal(s) and criteria for intended production and product(s) in main respects well organized and analyzed, background work for production commission is good with adequate source criticism, quantity and quality of design work (iteratively good, fairly innovative and with clear personal traits) good compared to time used, presentation(s) (customer meeting(s), portfolio, interim deliverables, assessment discussions, final deliverable, complementary deliverables etc.) good (overall comprehensiveness, visual and verbal quality) and with clear personal traits developed by student.

4 GOOD (VERY GOOD)
Production process develops very good with different stages very clearly defined, personal achievements and counselling are in all respect balanced, specification(s), goal(s) and criteria for intended production and product(s) in all respects well organized and analyzed, background work for production commission is very good with clear source criticism, quantity and quality of design work (iteratively very good, clearly innovative and with strong personal traits) very good compared to time used, presentation(s) (customer meeting(s), portfolio, interim deliverables, assessment discussions, final deliverable, complementary deliverables etc.) very good (overall comprehensiveness, visual and verbal quality) and with very personal traits developed by student.

5 EXCELLENT
Production process develops independently with different stages sharply defined, personal achievements and counselling are excellently balanced, specification(s), goal(s) and criteria for intended production and product(s) in all respects excellently organized and analyzed, background work for production commission is extremely good with clear source criticism, quantity and quality of design work (iteratively excellent, very innovative and with artistic personal traits) excellent compared to time used, presentation(s) (customer meeting(s), portfolio, interim deliverables, assessment discussions, final deliverable, complementary deliverables etc.) excellent (overall comprehensiveness, visual and verbal quality) and with strong and artistic personal traits developed by student.

Assessment Methods

Assessment by the teacher
Self-assessment
Peer assessment
Assessment of assignments

Back